|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
ff |
Two Centuries of Electric Light Source Innovations
Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Applied Physics Group Elementary Processes in Gas Discharge N-Laag, G2.04, 5600MB Eindhoven e-mail: mfgendre@tue.nl web site: http://www.geocities.com/mfgendre Light, and ways of producing it, undoubtedly belongs to the most fascinating and exciting kind of science man has ever tried to master. To be more exact, light sources do not belong to one kind of science but embody most of them. This is the development of vacuum techniques, of particular glasses, the purification of gases, the refinement of metals, the elaboration of fluorescent substances, and other countless engineering feats that allowed the making and improvement of all lamps we depend on today. Of course, many of these breakthroughs were precisely driven by the need for better light sources, having longer lifetimes, higher efficiency and better color properties. Yet, no one suspects that two centuries of scientific research, discoveries, developments and refinements stare upon us every time we flip a switch to give birth to light. It was exactly two hundred and one year ago that Humphry Davy set the foundations of the lighting industry with his simultaneous discoveries of light emission from incandescent metal wires and from electrical arcs (also by W. Petrov). Until 1802, and since 400,000 BC, man had relied solely on fire for his lighting needs. The invention of the electric pile by Alessandro Volta in 1800 opened a brand new era of perspectives. His stacks of copper, zinc and saltwater-soaked cardboards allowed the circulation of steady flows of electric currents that would eventually spark the lighting revolution. A revolution that was indeed slow to start.
The early years The discoveries of Davy and Petrov had to wait five decades, the development of steam-powered dynamos and the refinement of Volta’s battery, before becoming a practical reality. By 1850, Léon Foucault built the first carbon arc lamp that was subsequently used for theatrical lighting, while four years later Einrich Goebel, a German emigrant in the USA, made the first practical incandescent lamps. His sources were made of carbonized bamboo filaments enclosed in evacuated perfume bottles, and were intended to illuminate the shop window of his watch shop in New York city. A third way of electric lighting emerged in 1856 from the discovery by Michael Faraday (England) of the electric glow discharge in rarefied gasses (1831-35). This year, Julius Plücker and glass blower Enrich Geissler started some systematic investigations of electrical discharges in evacuated glass tubes provided with electrodes at each end. Subsequent experiments from Hittorf, Crookes and Golstein revealed that the light color of the discharge changed upon the addition of other gases and vapors. This phenomenon was finally understood in 1859, when Robert Bunsen and Gustav Kirchoff showed that each chemical element emits a specific set of light colors, or spectral lines. This discovery eventually set the foundations of spectroscopy. However, the inner working principles of these tubes were not understood until the 1920s, when General Electric (GE, USA) scientist Irving Langmuir studied and made the first accounts of the physics of ionized gases, and coined the term plasma to describe them. Then for this reason and others, “Geissler” and “Crookes” tubes were relegated to the rank of lab curiosities until the beginning of the twentieth century.
On the side of carbon arcs, many improvements followed the lamp of Foucault. From the work of Foucault and Dubosc, Serrin designed in 1859 a mechanical system to keep the arc at a given position despite the unequal burning rate of the cathode and the anode. Later, Crompton in England and Wallace-Farmer in the USA made an arc lamp that was regulated in voltage, thus permitting its use in series circuits. A further major step followed in 1870, when Russian engineer Paul Jablochoff invented a self-regulating arc lamp made of two close graphite rods separated by a layer of plaster of Paris. These lamps had a lifetime of 90 minutes, and a set of electrodes could not be re-ignited once it has been used. Despite its many drawbacks, this kind of source led in 1878 to the first practical electric arc street lighting in Paris. Two years later, Compton and Pochin in England and Friedrich von Hefner-Alteneck in Germany invented the differential carbon arc lamp, which was power-regulated by monitoring both arc current and voltage. This system eventually superseded Jablochoff’s lamp in street and industrial lighting. Carbon arc systems were pretty crude, cumbersome, noisy, dirty and drew a lot of electrical power. Beside this, its bright harsh light did not make it suitable for home lighting. The consequence is that many persons looked for a better and softer way of producing light, and it was already of common knowledge that a piece of carbon or metal heated by a current would do the job. However, things sound far simpler than they are, and most of the attempts went up in smoke as all materials eventually caught fire. The culprit was not so much the filament material than the poor quality of vacuum in early lamp prototypes.
Emergence and development of practical incandescent lamps The
development of incandescent filament lamps owes a lot to that of vacuum pumps. In 1838 it was discovered that carbon brought to incandescent does not consume in a air-free environment. From this knowledge the enclosed arc lamp was born in 1893 (Jandus and Mark) and had a lifetime of 150 hours, or three to five times that of lamps burning in free air. Although it was known that platinum wires could be brought to incandescence in open air for a long time (de la Rue, 1802), the need for lamps with higher filament temperatures was felt. Carbon rods were studied and used by J.W. Starr and M.J. Roberts between 1840 and 1854. The former made in 1845 a lamp partially evacuated with a mercury column from Torricelli’s barometer. Lodyguine, a Russian scientist, circumvented in 1856 the problem of poor vacuum by using an atmosphere of nitrogen instead. Two hundred of his carbon rod lamps were successfully used for lighting the harbor of St Petersburg. These first lamps, although successful in their own right, did not show a good lifetime due to the presence of residual impurity gases either in nitrogen or in vacuum. Two major breakthroughs speeded up the development toward a commercially viable lamp. First, in 1865 Sprengel invented the mercury-drop vacuum pump, which was much better than von Guericke’s pump developed around two hundred years before. This new device could evacuate a vessel down to at least a ten thousandth of the atmospheric pressure (10 Pa), a factor hundred lower that previously achieved. L. Boem then improved this pump in 1878, and reached a millionth of atmospheric pressure (10 mPa). However, no matter how good lamps were pumped down, their lifetime was still too short (several hours at best). The reason for this was discovered in 1879 by Francis Jehl and Thomas Edison (USA), who found that gases occluded in lamp materials are released in vacuum over time. They then patented an effective outgassing method, which consisted of heating the lamp during the pump-down process. In February of this same year, Joseph Swan demonstrated a working incandescent graphite rod lamp before the Royal Institution in Newcastle, England. This was eight months before Edison made his successful low resistance carbon filament lamp. Historically, Swan was the first to achieve a working carbon incandescent lamp. However, the lamp lifetime was reportedly too short to be commercially viable, which was not the case of Edison’s lamp. Edison primarily used a U-shaped carbonized cotton thread for the filament, later replaced by a carbonized bamboo fiber which boasted a luminous efficacy of 2 lm/W (ten times lower that today’s standard filament lamps) and a lifetime of 45 hours. By the
end of the 1870’s, the principles for The
search for higher luminous efficacies and color temperatures pushed the
research toward higher filament temperature. Besides a shortening of their
lifetime, this led to the severe blackening of lamp bulbs as carbon has a
high vapor pressure. Then, more refractory filament materials were needed
in order to reach more than 1200ºC. In 1893, Lodyguine investigated
several metals, which included tungsten, while four years later Carl Auer
von Welsbach succeeded at making an osmium filament lamp that was put on
market in 1902. Followed in 1905, Dr Hans Kuzel made the the end of all carbon and other straight filament lamps. From this point on, the development of incandescent sources slowed down. In 1933, the first coiled-coil tungsten filament lamp was made available for general lighting, although it was already in use since 1913 for projection purposes. The following years saw the introduction of krypton and xenon-filled lamps having higher filament temperatures owing to reduced evaporation rates. The impact of these later lamps was limited because the use of heavier gases did no lead to an efficacy increase higher than ten percents. The
last major advance in this domain happened at the end of the 1950’s with
the making by Zuber and Mosby (GE) of the first viable tungsten lamp
having a filling of halogens. The presence of this class of elements
allows a chemical cycle to return evaporated tungsten atoms back to its
source. This permitted the use of ultra-compact packages with 100% lumen
maintenance throughout lamp life (no bulb blackening). Also, its efficacy
was raised to 20 lm/W
Their pathetic efficacies make incandescent lamps more suitable for heating purpose than lighting. However, low production costs and simplicity of use (no current-limiting ballast required) ensures them several decades of strong use at home and for commercial lighting. If the future see the development of stable up-converting phosphors transforming infrared into visible light, or that of proper tungsten optical band-gap crystals, then incandescent sources will be able to compete with vapor discharge lamps.
The rise of electric discharge and arc lighting
The
only practical light sources worked out until 1860 where of incandescent
nature. Even the brilliant carbon arc emits its light mainly from the
white-hot anode; the contribution from the arc being relatively
negligible. This year, on September 3
rd , the Hungerford
suspension bridge
These
lamps performed stunningly well by 1900 standards, they had efficiencies
many times that of carbon filament lamps. The reason for this resides in
the light emission mechanisms that are different in these two kinds of
lamps. Incandescence arises from high thermal energy (i.e. lattice
vibrations in the filament material) that allows the emission of visible
light. Consequently, a large portion of the emitted radiation is in the
infrared (95% of input energy in standard filament lamps). As opposed to
this, an electric discharges and arcs emit their light upon excitation and
relaxation of gas or vapor atoms and molecules from electron impacts. Thus
more input energy can be radiated into useful visible light, leading to
much higher efficiencies (e.g. 35% visible light for low-pressure sodium
vapor). However, the difference between the two kinds of light sources
lies also in their emission spectra. If incandescent lamps give excellent
light color renditions, electric discharge lamps at this time did not. It was recognized that Cooper-Hewitt and Küch- Retschinsky lamps emitted a bluish light deficient in red, thus having poor color rendering properties. This limited their use to streets, warehouses and industries. This particular problem was addressed with series connected filament lamps that provided the additional red light and stabilized the electrical discharge. The extensive use of both types of mercury lamps started when proper electrodes were developed. Until the 1930’s, the original lamps had electrodes made of mercury pools, which waste a lot of electrical energy for the supply of electrons to the discharge.
High-pressure mercury lamps – the forerunners The lamp from Küch and Retschinsky had a limited success due to many unsolved problems, like proper electrodes, no tight quartz-to-metal seals and strong UV emissions leading to skin injuries. In the beginning of the 1930’s, many lighting companies worked to address these problems and aimed at presenting an atmospheric-pressure mercury lamp on the market. ![]() Because
no satisfactory sealing technique between quartz and tungsten was found,
this lamp used a discharge tube made of aluminosilicate hard glass. The
relatively low softening temperature of this material limited the power
loading of the electric arc to 10-100 W/cm and restricted its use to the
vertical position. This
The efficacy of such lamp was 30 to 40 lm/W, with a lifetime of a couple of thousands hours. The low power loading of the arc and the subsequent electrode power losses did not allow the making of efficient low-power mercury lamps. Only the 400 and 250W sizes were made available in this configuration. Also worth of interest, these original lamps did not integrate any starting aid, like an auxiliary probe. Thus GEC fitted each luminary with a small Tesla coil in order to ignite the lamp. This was certainly the first time that an igniter was used. By the
end of the 1930’s, Willem Elenbaas (Philips, the Netherlands)
theoretically predicted a rise of mercury lamp efficacy with the increase
of the arc power loading. This was effectively verified after the
invention of quartz-to-tungsten graded seals in 1935 (20 atmosphere) lamp,
the HP300 (75W). This was followed by a breakthrough source: the
water-cooled SP500W working at 80 atmospheres (Philips). Not only these
lamps had a better efficacy (40 and 60 lm/W respectively), they also
showed improved color rendering properties owing to the higher operating
pressure. The SP500W lamp was primarily designed and used for film projection and floodlighting applications, while the HP300 remained favored for street and industrial lighting due to its still insufficient emission of red light. This problem of color rendering pushed the research toward color improved lamps that used an integrated incandescent filament (acting also as a ballast - 1941) and/or a phosphor coating on the inner surface of the outer bulb to transform useless ultra violets into red light, thus filling the gap in the mercury spectrum.
In 1934, cadmium sulfide was found to be a suitable fluorescent material, although it provided only a mild color correction. The introduction of the color-corrected mercury lamp was made possible with the elaboration of manganese activated magnesium germanate and fluorogermanate in 1950, which improved greatly the color rendering index and had a beneficial effect of the lamp efficacy. Three years later, tin-activated orthophosphate was introduced, and in an attempt to have proportionally more red emission, “deluxe” lamps with a rosy glaze on the outer bulb were marketed for a short while by a number of manufacturers (1956).
Then in 1967, the hugely successful europium-activated vanadate and phospho-vanadate phosphors inherited from color TV technology were introduced and are still in use today. These modern color improved mercury lamps have a color rendering index (CRI) of 65 against 15 for clear lamps and a luminous efficacy of 60 lm/W. The present design results from a large number of improvements in the lamp structure that occurred in the 1950’s and 1960’s. Among them are new kinds of quartz-to-metal seals using 20 micron-thick molybdenum foils pressed in quartz. Also, the changeover from thorium to alkali oxide electrodes (Osram, Germany) permitted a better lumen maintenance throughout lamp life. The last major innovation concerning these lamps occurred in 1998 with the invention of UHP (Ultra High Performance/Pressure) lamps by Hanns Fischer (Philips) for LCD projection purposes. These new sources operate with an internal pressure of about 200 atmospheres, thus leading to a strong continuum in the emission spectrum and a high arc power loading. These make this kind of lamp efficient (60 lm/W) and optically small (0.7 mm arc gap), thus allowing for an excellent optical control. Standard high-pressure mercury lamps (not UHP) are today on the brink of extinction because of the environmental threat posed by mercury, and their relatively poor performances compared to metal halide and high-pressure sodium sources.
Metal halide lamps – the legacy of mercury sources It was recognized since the earliest days of mercury lamps that the lack of red light in their emission spectrum impeded heavily on their widespread use. In 1906, Guercke already suggested to add some red emitting metals to the lamp of Küch and Retschinsky in order to improve its color properties. M. Wolke followed this procedure in 1912 and used cadmium and zinc. This turned out to be unsuccessful due to a low lamp cold-spot temperature (600ºC), which led to an insufficient zinc and cadmium vapor pressures. Also, these metals readily attacked the quartz envelope, thus rendering the lamp useless after a couple of tens of hours of operation.
loading, with the consequence we can imagine on the life expectancy. In the next decade, studies turned toward metal-halogen compounds that have higher vapor pressures than metals at a given temperature. Gilbert Reiling (GE) patented the first metal halide lamp in 1961, which was intended to replace high-pressure mercury lamps in their sockets. It had a filling primarily of mercury, thallium and sodium iodide that showed a sizeable increase of lamp efficacy (up to 100 lm/W) and color properties, and made it more suitable for commercial, street and industrial lighting. Eventually GE marketed this lamp in 1964 with additives of sodium and scandium iodides instead. Most major manufacturers followed shortly thereafter, with varied compositions in order to meet different lighting needs and to circumvent competitors’ patents. Today the most popular additives are sodium-scandium iodides, lithium soitum-thallium-indium halides and several mixtures of rare-earth halides. The sixties and seventies witnessed a furious development of metal-halide lamps in different geometries from tubular to reflector, and in power range between 175W and 5000W in order to meet the soaring demands in the many applications it found. One of the last strongholds this kind of source did not invade was at home. At the end of the 1970’s GE, Sylvania (USA) and Philips designed prototypes of self-ballasted metal-halide lamps intended to replace standard filament lamps for domestic applications. This was ultimately proven unsuccessful due to some lethal drawbacks such as the lack of hot re-strike capabilities and the prohibitive cost of the lamps. Two
major breakthroughs followed at the beginning of the 1980’s. In 1981,
Thorn Lighting (England) presented the first metal halide lamp with a
sintered alumina ceramic discharge tube, which resulted from ten years of
research and development. Unfortunately, this revolutionary source did not
reach the market due to a lamp voltage/current characteristic that In 1991, Osram, Philips, Valeo and many other car equipment manufacturers engaged themselves in the ‘vedilis’ project, which led to the xenonmetal halide lamps (D1 and D2) for automotive headlights. Philips then revived metal halide lamps with ceramic discharge tubes in 1995, when it launched its range of CDM lamps. Osram and GE soon followed. These lamps present today an alternative to high-pressure sodium sources for downtown street lighting. The use of this particular design allows for a better lamp-to-lamp color matching, higher efficacies and better color rendering. Even more so, the bluish light of metal halide performs better than the orange hue of high-pressure sodium when scotopic vision prevails in low illumination levels at night.
Low-pressure mercury fluorescent lamps – toward domestic applications The
origin of fluorescent tubes goes back to the invention in 1901 of the
low-pressure mercury lamp by Cooper-Hewitt. For the same reasons as its
high-pressure counterpart, its use was restricted to places where color
rendering was not an issue. Right from the start, Cooper-Hewitt worked to
improve his lamp by applying some fluorescent dyes (primarily Rhodamine B)
on the bulb surface and later on luminary reflectors in order to
compensate for the lack of red emission. The idea of using fluorescence to
convert invisible light into useful radiation was not new, and already in Back to the twentieth century, it was discovered in 1920 that an electrical discharge in a proper mixture of argon and mercury at low pressure could radiate efficiently (60% of power input) ultraviolet light at 253.7nm and 184.9 nm. Six years later, Meyer, Spanner and Germer from Osram (Germany) published a landmark report where they described a low-pressure mercury vapor lamp provided with externally-heated oxide-coated electrodes, and an internally phosphor-coated bulb to convert UV radiation into visible light. This document set what would become the first successful fluorescent tubes. However, its marketing had to wait for the development of efficient electron-emitting electrodes by M. Pirani and A. Rüttenauer (Osram) in 1932, and the elaboration of the calcium tungstate - zinc silicate phosphor. Then in September of 1935, the first tubular fluorescent lamp was demonstrated before the Illuminating Engineering Society in Cincinnati, North America. This was presumably from General Electric, who had taken over the patent of André Claude on a similar fluorescent tube in 1932. Osram followed in 1936, and displayed its ‘L’ lamp at the World Exhibition held in Paris. Between 1936 and 1938, most major lamp manufacturers made fluorescent tubes available both in Europe and in the US for general lighting applications. These lamps had a tube diameter of 38mm, an efficiency of about 30 lm/W and a moderate color-rendering index, yet good enough for its use at home.
In
1942, A.H. McKeag from GEC (England) made a giant leap with the discovery
of calcium and strontium-activated halophosphates. Lamps using this
phosphor Philips made the next step with the introduction in 1973 of the three-band phosphors. This boosted the efficacy up to 90 lm/W with excellent color rendition (IRC 80-90). This new formulation also allowed the increase of the lamp wall power loading and led to the reduction of the tube diameter from 38mm (T12) to 26mm (T8), and then to 16mm (T5) at the beginning of the 1980s. A decade later, Osram shrunk things further and put a 7mmdiameter (T2) fluorescent tube on the market (Lumilux-FM). The
reduction of lamp size permitted the design of compact fluorescent lamps
with integrated ballast. The first of this kind was presented by Philips
at a world technical conference held in Eindhoven in 1976. In 1980, this
company introduced successfully its SL*18, followed by an electronic
version in 1982. Competitors were quick to catch up and by the end of the
1980’s compact fluorescent lamps were widely available at a reduced cost
and package size. The success of these lamps was partly due to the energy
crisis that raised the cost of electric
At last and not least, from the eighties until the mid-nineties several lamp makers introduced electrodeless versions of fluorescent lamps. In these sources the discharge originates from an electromagnetic field generated by an induction coil antenna. The suppression of the electrodes increases the lamp lifetime up to sixty to a hundred thousands of hours. Fluorescent lamps were the first and only discharge lamps to reach the level of domestic lighting. Today, they provide a wide range of color temperature with excellent color rendition and high efficacies. This explains why they account for seventy percent of all lamps used in commercial illuminations. Development still continues today, and priorities are set to size and efficiency. To this respect, the use of surface-mounted electronic components permitted the making of smaller CFL lamps to fit in low-power luminaries, therefore claiming more ground to its incandescent counterpart.
Low-pressure sodium lamps – reaching summits in efficacy Extensive experiments with electrical discharges in alkali vapors could have started only in 1920 when A.H. Compton formulated a borate glass resistant to sodium. Alkalis, being strong reducers, require special glasses as normal materials like soda-lime silicates are readily attacked and lead to the formation of a brown light-absorbing film. Two years later, in 1922, M. Pirani and E. Lax from Osram experimented sodium discharges for lighting applications. The following year, Compton and C.C. van Voorhis in the USA attained an efficacy of 340 lm/W with a lamp externally heated by an oven. Naturally, the calculation of the efficacy did not take into account the energy provided to keep the lamp at its optimum working temperature of 260°C. Then,
in 1931, both Philips and Osram made the first viable
From 1933 until 1958, lamps were composed of a separate discharge tube and a double-walled vacuum flask. In 1958, Philips marketed an integral lamp, which included the discharge tube within an evacuated bulb thus preventing the former from getting dirty, as it was the case in the previous design. Subsequent work was done on increasing the lamp efficacy by improving its thermal insulation. A first solution consisted of enclosing the discharge tube in several infrared-absorbing glass sleeves. Then infrared mirrors made of gold or bismuth thin
films were employed. Philips
This led in 1983 to a lamp reaching the symbolic barrier of 200 lm/W (SOX-E, by Philips), which is the highest efficacy reached yet. The reason why low-pressure sodium is so efficient at producing visible light is that this element, under the right conditions, radiates an almost-monochromatic yellow light almost coinciding with the peak sensitivity of the human eye in photopic vision. Also, this yellow light emission corresponds to transitions from the two lowest (resonant) energy levels of sodium, thus allowing an efficient transfer of energy from the electric discharge to the excitation of sodium atoms. In the
1980s, several low-power lamps were experimented for replacing filament
lamps in security lighting. Technically these sources were successful but
their prohibitive cost and the need for specific ballasts prevented their
widespread use. Interestingly, Philips designed a LPS lamp that had
electrical characteristics closely matching that of existing fluorescent
tubes, so the ballasting equipment was already standard. Today, low-pressure sodium lamps remain unchallenged in terms of luminous efficacy. Its bi-chromatic orange spectrum is the key to its efficiency, but is also the limitation factor that restrains its use for street and industrial lighting. In return, its light leads to excellent seeing contrasts, particularly in foggy weather. Further developments of these sources concern its high frequency operation and improvement of thermal insulation, which will certainly bring the efficacy up to 230 lm/W in a more or less distant future. Also worth of interest is the development of electrodeless versions that obviate the need for life-limiting parts such as the electrodes. These sources are however not likely to reach the market due to difficulties in the making of a proper discharge vessel.
High-pressure sodium lamps – a compromise between color and efficacy It was
known that increasing the pressure of a sodium discharge would lead to a
lower efficacy, but also to a broader and richer spectrum having better
color-rendering properties. The borate glass originally developed by
Compton and the other materials used in low-pressure sodium lamps are not
suitable for high-pressure operation. As the power loading and the
temperature of the discharge increase, the reactivity of sodium toward the
wall increases and lamps During
the following years, systematic studies were carried out on high-pressure
alkali discharges. Among them, cesium looked promising due to its
relatively white spectrum. However, the final choice was sodium because of
its good compromise between The design of this lamp was radically different than that of metal halide and the mercury lamps. It also called for different types of ballasts. While metal halide and mercury sources were and still are powered in the USA with step-up leakage transformers, high-pressure sodium lamps required a choke and an external igniter. Then followed several versions of lamps with built-in internal switches that use the inductance of the choke to kick-start the discharge tube. Most of these sources have a filling of mercury, xenon and sodium. The role of xenon is to allow the lamp to start, while mercury sets the electric field in the lamp discharge (positive column) and does not contribute to the emission spectrum. Without it, the lamp voltage drop would be too low and the current too high, thus requiring an inefficient and bulky ballast and impairing the luminous efficacy. The environmental problems caused by mercury forces its suppression, and mercury-free HPS lamps were made available by mid 1990’s. These lamps have a higher xenon pressure and some starting aid like sintered metal strips on the discharge tube surface (Philips). The 1980’s saw also the development of the so-called white HPS lamps by Thorn, Philips and Iwasaki (Japan), which provide an incandescent-like color at four times the efficacy of tungsten filament lamps. These sources are still popular today even with the advent of ceramic metal halide lamps. The advantages of white HPS lies in the large portion of red light in its emission spectrum, leading to a color temperature as low as 2500K. Metal halide lamps cannot reach such war white tone. Also worth of notice is a lamp developed in the mid-1990s by Osram (DSX-T), which has its color temperature that can be changed from 2700K (standard tungsten white) to 2900K (tungsten halogen white) by a flick of a switch.
Bright perspectives The field of lighting had many changes since the revolution in lifestyle and lightstyle Davys’s discoveries induced! So affected has been and still is the field of lamp manufacturing. The eighteenth century witnessed the slow emergence of precursors that led to the exponential development of myriads of sources in the next hundred years. By the dawn of the twentieth century, thousands of lamp makers were struggling on a boiling market, and to say the truth, it was not far from easy to jump in this business since techniques and physics involved at this time were not as developed as today. A century later, only three major (general) manufacturers have survived: Philips, Osram and GE, who count more than 3500 references in their product catalogs. A couple of hundred of medium-sized, minor or specialized manufacturers surround them. They are now facing new challenges that will change our lifestyle and lightstyle through the 21st century: the development and extensive use of white LEDs, and the abandon of harmful materials in all vapor discharge lamps while still pushing upward their luminous efficacies and color rendering properties.
References More technical and historical details are available at: http://www.geocities.com/mfgendre [1] F.J.M. Bothe, AEG-Telefunken Ontladingen/Schakels, 57 p., June 1979. [2] “Lighting progress in 1959”, Illuminating Engineering, pp.140, March 1960. [3] R. Küch and T. Retschinsky, “Photometrische und spektralphotometrische messungen am quecksilberbogen bei hohem dampfdruck”, Annalen der Physik, vol. 20, pp. 563-583, June 1906. [4] C.C. Paterson, “Luminous discharge tube lighting”, The journal of good lighting, pp.308-318, December 1932. [5] P.J. Oranje, Gasontladingslampen, Uitgave Meulenhoff & Co., Amsterdam, 288p., 1942. [6] J.L. Ouweltjes, W. Elenbaas and K.R. Labberté, “A new high-pressure mercury lamp with fluorescent bulb”, Philips Technical Review, no. 5, pp. 109-144, November 1951. [7] G.H. Reiling, “Metallic halide discharge lamps”, US patent #3,234,421, January 23rd, 1961. [8] G.W. Stoer, History of lights and lighting, Philips Lighting B.V., the Netherlands, 46 p., 1988. [9] “Fifty years of low-pressure sodium lighting”, Philips Lighting News, no. 8, 1982. [10] K. Schmidt, “Metal vapor lamps”, US patent #2,971,110, February 7th, 1961. [11] W.C. Louden and W.C. Matz, “High-intensity sodium lamp design data for various sizes”, Illuminating Engineering , pp. 560-561, September 1966.
|
|Home| |Contatti| |Kit Solo Lampada| |Perché alti costi| |Privacy| |Domande frequenti| |Links| |Condizioni di vendita| |www.ricambiolampade.net | |Lavora con noi | |NukAlert| |Partners| |Dove siamo|
Per comunicazioni, commenti, suggerimenti e domande
sulle lampade di ricambio cliccate qui
I nostri uffici sono in Via della Mola 1, 00037 Segni (Roma)
Ricambio Lampade s.r.l. PI/CF 09653091000 REA RM 1179470 cap soc 10000,00 i.v.
Tel. 06 9701568 e 06 97231520 - fax 06 98380113
dal lunedì al venerdì dalle 9:00 alle 13:00 e dalle 15:00 alle 19:00
|Home| |Contatti| |Kit Solo Lampada| |Perché alti costi| |Privacy| |Domande frequenti| |Links| |Condizioni di vendita| |www.ricambiolampade.net | |Lavora con noi | |NukAlert| |Partners| |Dove siamo|
Per comunicazioni, commenti, suggerimenti e domande
sulle lampade di ricambio cliccate qui
I nostri uffici sono in Via della Mola 1, 00037 Segni (Roma)
Ricambio Lampade s.r.l. PI/CF 09653091000 REA RM 1179470 cap soc 10000,00 i.v.
Tel. 06 9701568 e 06 97231520 - fax 06 98380113
dal lunedì al venerdì dalle 9:00 alle 13:00 e dalle 15:00 alle 19:00
|Home| |Contatti| |Kit Solo Lampada| |Perché alti costi| |Privacy| |Domande frequenti| |Links| |Condizioni di vendita| |www.ricambiolampade.net | |Lavora con noi | |NukAlert| |Partners| |Dove siamo|
Per comunicazioni, commenti, suggerimenti e domande
sulle lampade di ricambio cliccate qui
I nostri uffici sono in Via della Mola 1, 00037 Segni (Roma)
RL3 s.r.l. PI/CF 09653091000 REA RM 1179470 cap soc 10000,00 i.v.
Tel. 06 5740506
dal lunedì al venerdì dalle 9:00 alle 13:00 e dalle 15:00 alle 19:00
|Home| |Contatti| |Kit Solo Lampada| |Perché alti costi| |Privacy| |Domande frequenti| |Links| |Condizioni di vendita| |www.ricambiolampade.net | |Lavora con noi | |NukAlert| |Partners| |Dove siamo|
Per comunicazioni, commenti, suggerimenti e domande
sulle lampade di ricambio cliccate qui
I nostri uffici sono in Via della Mola 1, 00037 Segni (Roma)
RL3 s.r.l. PI/CF 09653091000 REA RM 1179470 cap soc 10000,00 i.v.
Tel. 06 5740506 WA 3519143043
dal lunedì al venerdì dalle 9:00 alle 13:00 e dalle 15:00 alle 19:00
|Home| |Contatti| |Kit Solo Lampada| |Perché alti costi| |Privacy| |Domande frequenti| |Links| |Condizioni di vendita| |www.ricambiolampade.net | |Lavora con noi | |NukAlert| |Partners| |Dove siamo|
Per comunicazioni, commenti, suggerimenti e domande
sulle lampade di ricambio cliccate qui
I nostri uffici sono in Via della Mola 1, 00037 Segni (Roma)
RL3 s.r.l. PI/CF 09653091000 REA RM 1179470 cap soc 10000,00 i.v.
Tel. 06 5740506 WhatsApp 3519143043
dal lunedì al venerdì dalle 9:00 alle 13:00 e dalle 15:00 alle 19:00
|Home| |Contatti| |Kit Solo Lampada| |Perché alti costi| |Privacy| |Domande frequenti| |Links| |Condizioni di vendita| |www.ricambiolampade.net | |Lavora con noi | |NukAlert| |Partners| |Dove siamo|
Per comunicazioni, commenti, suggerimenti e domande
sulle lampade di ricambio cliccate qui
I nostri uffici sono in Via della Mola 1, 00037 Segni (Roma) RL3 s.r.l. PI/CF 09653091000 REA RM 1179470 cap soc 10000,00 i.v. Tel. 06 5740506 WhatsApp 3519143043 dal lunedì al venerdì dalle 9:00 alle 13:00 e dalle 15:00 alle 19:00 |